Advertisement

Michael Saylor Enters Debate Over Dilution Concerns in New Strategy Stock Issuance

Strategy’s BTC Yield fell from 13.0% to 12.8% after its latest bitcoin purchase, triggering a debate on X over whether the move was dilutive for shareholders.

The argument comes as bitcoin (BTC) weakens further, with Strategy (MSTR) once again under scrutiny for its capital-raising and accumulation strategy.

A public exchange has emerged on X between Executive Chairman Michael Saylor and bitcoin advocate Matthew Kratter over whether the company’s recent financing and BTC acquisition created or destroyed shareholder value.

The dispute centers on Strategy’s internal KPI, BTC Yield, which measures bitcoin per assumed diluted share. Company figures show the metric declined from 13.0% on June 1 to 12.8% on June 8 following the purchase of 1,550 BTC.

Kratter argued that the drop points to dilution on a bitcoin-per-share basis. Over the same period, Strategy’s holdings rose from 843,706 BTC to 845,256 BTC, while assumed diluted shares increased from 382.756 million to 384.180 million. BTC Gain year-to-date also edged lower from 87,754 BTC to 86,328 BTC.

Saylor countered that BTC Yield is a narrow metric that only reflects bitcoin per share and does not account for overall shareholder value creation. He added that the deal also boosted U.S. dollar reserves by about $100 million, lifting total cash holdings to roughly $1 billion, which he said makes the transaction accretive when cash is included alongside BTC.

On a pure BTC-per-share basis, the numbers suggest dilution. However, when broader balance sheet effects are factored in, Saylor maintains the deal remains value accretive.

The discussion has also drawn pushback from other commentators, some of whom argue Strategy is shifting its framing by emphasizing different metrics over time, noting that BTC Yield was previously presented as a key performance indicator.

Others compared it to a familiar corporate pattern in which companies adjust or replace KPIs when earlier metrics no longer support the narrative they want to emphasize.