CME Group filed suit against the CFTC on Thursday, claiming the regulator mishandled its approval of Kalshi’s first U.S.-listed perpetual futures product. The exchange is seeking to have both the approval and the self-certified contracts overturned in court.
You’re reading State of Crypto, CoinDesk’s newsletter exploring the intersection of digital assets and government policy.
Futures or Swaps?
The Narrative
At the core of CME’s complaint is the allegation that the CFTC failed to properly evaluate Kalshi’s application before signing off on its perpetual futures offering. The legal move comes just a day after outgoing CEO Terry Duffy confirmed the firm would challenge the late-May approval.
Why It Matters
It’s rare for a firm of CME’s stature to take legal action against its primary regulator. Perpetual futures, or “perps,” are still a relatively new instrument, heavily associated with crypto markets. CME argues that the CFTC’s process fell short of Dodd-Frank requirements and could ultimately harm its business.
Breaking It Down
CME’s position is that perpetual contracts pose a threat to its traditional long-dated futures products. The lawsuit claims the CFTC overlooked key considerations and misclassified perps, arguing they should fall under the definition of “swaps” in the Dodd-Frank Act rather than “futures.”
That distinction is critical, as each category comes with different regulatory frameworks and compliance obligations. CEO Terrence Duffy recently told CNBC that how these products are classified directly determines the rules governing market participants.
According to the filing, the CFTC did not conduct a thorough legal analysis when approving Kalshi’s Bitcoin perpetual contract as a futures product. CME notes that the regulator failed to reference the Dodd-Frank definition of a “swap” altogether, suggesting a lack of rigorous review.
Instead, the complaint argues, the agency effectively rubber-stamped the application.
Meanwhile, the market for perpetual products is expanding quickly. On the same day Kalshi received approval, the CFTC issued a no-action letter to Coinbase, potentially paving the way for similar offerings—likely via offshore structures.
Perpetual futures remain a novel product and were not explicitly addressed in Dodd-Frank, adding complexity to the classification debate.
Former StarkWare general counsel Katherine Kirkpatrick Bos noted that while “swap” is clearly defined in Dodd-Frank, “future” is not, giving the CFTC discretion in categorizing new instruments. CME, however, maintains that the lack of an expiration date should exclude perps from being considered futures.
Bos also pointed out there is no clear precedent establishing that “future delivery” is a strict requirement for a contract to qualify as a futures product.
This Week
Tuesday
14:00 UTC (10:00 a.m. ET): The Senate Banking Committee will hold a hearing on “The Affordability Agenda,” featuring industry leaders including Consumer Bankers Association CEO Lindsey Johnson, National Association of Realtors President Kevin Brown and Digital Chamber CEO Cody Carbone.
Wednesday
14:00 UTC (10:00 a.m. ET): The House Financial Services Committee will host a hearing titled “Future of Payments.” Speakers have yet to be announced.
Thursday
14:00 UTC (10:00 a.m. ET): The House Financial Services Committee will hold a hearing on “The Future of How America Invests.” Speaker details are still pending.
18:00 UTC (2:00 p.m. ET): The House Oversight Subcommittee on Military and Foreign Affairs will convene a hearing on digital currencies.
For feedback or topic suggestions, readers can reach out via email or connect on social platforms.
